Dr. McCullough raised a critical issue which is the seeming duplicitous manner in which research papers are being written & published, appearing to whitewash mRNA technology & mRNA vaccine lethality

He is very correct & remains a technical gaint, the lead of the Freedom Movement in terms of started it etc., a mentor of mine, as such, I see his point & ask same for Mead, Rose, Seneff et al. paper
McCullough is absolutely on point here for academic research publishing has become a political, incompetent, deceitful, biased affair, owned by pharma and IMO evil forces. see McCullough’s substack below and his concerns with how the abstract is written. IMO there must be no play with the language and we must be unequivocal, the Malone, Bourla, Bancel et a. mRNA technology and vaccine must be stopped complete, no more to no child, or adult or elderly. Under no condition. No more study of this. It never worked and is ineffective and harmful, deadly.
Plain hard stop!

Dr. Paul Alexander’s Newsletter_Alexander News Network is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Similarly, the paper I asked to be taken down or abstract rewritten given the incorrect manner mRNA vaccines are portrayed in terms of apparent softening of language by researchers who prior called for all such vaccines to be stopped. The paper is by Mead et al. and is within the following substack.

This one paragraph in abstract of the Mead, Wolfinger, Rose, Seneff, Kirsch et al. paper and these 3 words indicate why this abstract MUST be rewritten (paper taken down): 1)’modified’ is a Malone

Dr. Paul Alexander
·
Feb 10

‘Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.’

Read full story

and the now paper Dr. McCullough is raising issue with, and rightfully. Yet you cannot have it both ways. If these researchers are problematic with the written language, then so is the paper by Mead et al. as outlined in the above substack I wrote. I get the sense Dr. McCullough did not see the final draft of the Mead et al. paper and it will be good to address the issues I raised as to the use of the wishy washy softening terms i)modified 2) until and 3)moratorium

Courageous Discourse™ with Dr. Peter McCullough & John Leake

Ventricular Tachycardia Cardiac Arrest after mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination

By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH As the modern world is recognizing record numbers of unexpected deaths with no antecedent disease as a result of cardiac arrest, the medical literature is begrudgingly allowing sporadic case reports to be published. It is reasonable to conclude there must be tremendous resistance against publishing large series of cardia…
Read more
17 hours ago · 195 likes · 56 comments · Peter McCullough, MD

Dr. McCullough:
‘Minato et al, reported a fatal vaccine-induced ventricular tachycardia arrest in a man around age 40 years the day after Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. As a cardiologist, I see this case as a straightforward myocarditis cardiac arrest. However the manuscript is laced with statements that seem to placate fellow authors, reviewers and editors on continued mass vaccination. For example, without presenting any data, the authors state “in most cases the symptoms are mild and tend to resolve on their own.” Later in the abstract “the benefits of vaccination appear to outweigh the side effects.”’
Highlighted abstract areas Dr. McCullough has issues with and I agree and as such, Mead, Rose et al. must rewrite their own published paper abstract (see my above substact):

Dr. Paul Alexander’s Newsletter_Alexander News Network is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Go to Dr Alexancer on Substack
Author: Dr. Paul Alexander