Hhmmmm, an interesting exchange with a serious person given some points I raised & he said “Covid was very similar to the 1918 ‘flu’ – most people died from the lack/unavailability of antibiotics, not

the virus itself; bacterial pneumonia secondary to viral infection was killer! hhmm, said IVM etc. for general use was MOOT, not needed, for high-risk, been widely available, but saved v few lives
In other words, the early treatment model he debated was needed, definitely, but that it was the anti-biotics (with additional anti-inflammatory and anti-viral properties e.g. doxycycline) that was the key ingredient of early treatment, the anti-infectives less so, and that it should have only been used for high-risk and not general population yet made available. In other words, treatment to be tailored and not carte blanche. Not leave the patient to turn blue. And with an understanding that COVID, severe COVID was more a blood clotting illness than a respiratory one where anti-coagulants were critical tin the therapeutic approach and early e.g. micro-thrombi.
We agreed that we were still not sure about what was released (intentional or by accident from some lab and where, maybe multiple release points and with more US involvement than we would care to want) or circulating, agreed that it had to be some form of respiratory pathogen or entity (given respiratory illnesses especially in our high-risk elderly) and even nano-mRNA or similar was dispersed, 😉 we let our thoughts take flight…we agreed that it had to be circulating, whatever it was, years before 2020 or 2019 & that the populations were already immune (to some extent) see Diamond Princess, USS Theodore Roosevelt;

Alexander COVID News-Dr. Paul Elias Alexander’s substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

And no doubt, via the precautionary principle, until clear definitive agents were available, we would use safe, effective, available, approved and repurposed therapeutics with a signal of benefit, combined and sequenced and dosed and timed appropriately under doctor care. This was early treatment. Yet carte blanche use of IVM and HCQ etc. (anti-virals) was not needed, MOOT, unhelpful. Most would have recovered on their own. As they did. Many also were likely already immune (natural immunity).
That no COVID vaccine, none, was ever needed. I agreed with that fully. Not even for elderly. Not in this case.
Hhhhmmm…what say you? Provacative??
We also agreed that the danger is from the mRNA technology underpinning gene based mRNA vaccines with an epidemic of coming cancer/dementia/heart failure/RT etc. — some conveniently 20 years downstream when the idiocrats and pathocrats are all dead.
What say you on early treatment, what an interesting debate to have.
It’s the vaccine, stupid, it’s the vaccine; it’s the spike protein, stupid, it’s the spike protein!

Alexander COVID News-Dr. Paul Elias Alexander’s substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Go to Dr Alexancer on Substack
Author: Dr. Paul Alexander