2nd Smartest Guy in the World, major substack writer, wrote this in response to my substack on the threat by Malone on Dr. Karikó: “I worked with Dr. Malone beginning in July 2021 and his concerns

I worked with Dr. Nass, I find very smart, very passionate, a warrior in our fight, wonderful human being, just superbly special and thoughtful, I admire her acumen immensely, but we do not need agree and IMO she is misguided in her substack on Malone (“Malone v Breggin”) and has not addressed the key question (s) Dr. Breggin had. I am sorry, I tell it as it is and Dr. Nass took it to the public so public then it must be. I think Dr. Nass made a mistake here for she went against the Breggins (her right) yet this is not what this is about. The Breggins are good people, under attack and as a human being, I cannot stand by as someone is being destroyed, their life’s work and the warrior leadership role they have had, the key seminal roles societally they have had, be destroyed, as others stay silent in fear. I know of too many who are horrified at how badly, poorly the Breggins have been treated. I just want to be fair.
No.

This is why Steve Bannon yesterday by interviewing Dr. Breggin, showed why he is different. A cut above the rest of the pusillanimous weaklings.
People want to defend them (the Breggins) or even talk up but are silenced and intimidated by being sued and factions in the Freedom movement ostracizing them and pulling donor money. Dr. Nass failed to ask the hard questions needed.
For example, Dr. Nass could have asked this of Malone in her substack yet failed to: “Why did you Malone not mention the ResearchGate paper of January 2020 (or abouts) when you went on Weinstein? Saying now that it was there in ResearchGate is not good enough for the public did not know this, it is mainly we researchers know of this forum, so why did you not mention that paper in that interview, your paper? had you mentioned that paper and told the nation that the mRNA technology you said you invented was so prone to ADE and deadly, then many would have not listened to the CDC etc. and would have not taken it and died”…something to that effect.
But Dr. Nass did not ask this. Dr. Nass did not understand the Breggin’s paper for the questions were so elegant and simple as written by Breggin. Yet very clear. And deserves an answer in proper interviews. I for one think Malone is one to be called by the house and senate to testify under oath and using experts in the field to ask questions, those with no links to Malone or who would not incur any loss should they do the questioning. I could and I know several who would.
I have been told by groups I belong to that ‘Paul, this donor in our group said they follow Malone and because you question him, they are not happy so I need them to be happy so I am asking you to stop questioning him, please, the donor is unhappy, it is not that you are wrong and in fact I think you are right but the donor will walk.’ Can you understand this exchange and the madness now in the Freedom movement? I responded by removing myself from the group. So we are being censored within the Freedom movement itself by the donors putting muscle on the groups etc. It is insane and in the end, the public loses. Always loses. It is perverse and outrageous. As perverse as medical doctors standing by as their patients died and not using early treatment. Whether it worked or not, you never leave your patient to sway in the wind until their lips turned blue.
Now see this substack comment by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World (support that substack) and btw, we can disagree as scientists. I disagree with Dr. Nass, so does 2nd smartest guy and many others disagree with her assessment and reply in her substack “Malone v Breggin”. That does not mean we sue each other. We engage in healthy debate. That Malone, was meant for you. This debate is scientist to scientist.
e.g. I await EPOCH Times doing a proper interview with you with serious questions as the leader in media it is. IMO and as an investigative journalist (quasi) myself, it has failed to address the many questions out there. It’s interviews of you are puffy and pink, social discussions now. And they know it. EPOCH has interviewed me many times and we are all good social friends and I like them, I love Jekielek, my personal friend and he is among the best, this guy is the real deal, deep, intelligent, but he must now step up and deliver the proper interview of Malone with the right questions. The likes of Jekielek is very capable and so I wait. I may get cancelled and shunned and blackballed by EPOCH after being a favorites’ of theirs, but that is the price I am willing to pay.
Over to you Jan. So we now depend on Yan. Yan is the only media person out there I think is smart enough once we tee him up, who could get the answers. But I am available if Malone is up to it and some others messaged me today they would be too. They have questions.
2nd Smartest Guy in the World
Writes 2nd Smartest Guy in the World
1 hr ago

What did Robert Malone mean after the media accredited biochemist Katalin Karikó as being an mRNA-vaccine pioneer when he told her in e-mail exchanges “This is not going to end well,”; meaning what?
Did Malone threaten the safety of Dr. Katalin Karikó? I read it as a threat. He needs to explain this threat or statement. Would you feel threatened if someone who was in angry conflict with you warned you in writing, “This is not going to end well…
Read more
17 hours ago · 40 likes · 46 comments · Dr. Paul Alexander

Go to Dr Alexancer on Substack
Author: Dr. Paul Alexander